Mediavision2020 Logo
Geofencing ROI: Case Studies and Results Across 6 Industries

Geofencing ROI: Case Studies and Results Across 6 Industries

May 25, 2025
Updated October 26, 2026
Chuck Stephens — Director of Client Services, Mediavision2020
TL;DR — Key Takeaways
  • 1Reported geofencing outcomes can vary significantly by industry, tactic, creative quality, and measurement approach.
  • 2Competitor conquesting campaigns consistently outperform all other geofencing tactics across every industry studied.
  • 3The average geofencing campaign generates 15-40% incremental foot traffic lift above baseline.
  • 4Cost per store visit can vary based on market, campaign design, and measurement approach.
  • 5Campaigns that combine geofencing with retargeting and cross-device targeting outperform single-channel campaigns by 2-3x.

What Real Geofencing ROI Looks Like

The most common question from marketers evaluating geofencing is simple: does it actually work? The answer, based on campaign data across thousands of campaigns and multiple industries, is yes — but with significant variation based on industry, tactic, creative quality, and measurement approach.

This article presents real case study results across 6 industries, with specific metrics that illustrate both the potential and the realistic expectations for geofencing campaigns.

Case Study 1: Automotive Dealership

Campaign: Competitor dealership conquesting for a regional Toyota dealer. Geofenced 6 competitor dealerships within 15 miles. 90-day campaign, $12,000 budget.

Results: 847,000 impressions served. 0.38% CTR (3,218 clicks). 142 incremental showroom visits attributed to campaign. 23 vehicle sales attributed to geofencing-influenced visits. Average vehicle gross profit: $3,200. Total attributed revenue: $73,600. ROAS: 6.1x.

Case Study 2: Fast-Casual Restaurant Chain

Campaign: Competitor conquesting for a 12-location fast-casual chain. Geofenced 28 competitor locations across 4 markets. 60-day campaign, $18,000 budget.

Results: 1.4M impressions. 0.42% CTR. 2,847 incremental store visits. Average check: $14.50. Total attributed revenue: $41,282. ROAS: 2.3x (direct). Long-term ROAS (repeat visits over 12 months): 8.7x.

Case Study 3: Credit Union

Campaign: Auto loan acquisition targeting car dealerships. Geofenced 34 dealerships in a 3-county market. 90-day campaign, $8,500 budget.

Results: 620,000 impressions. 0.29% CTR. 87 auto loan applications attributed to campaign. 62 loans funded. Average loan balance: $28,400. Average net interest income over loan life: $3,200. Total attributed NII: $198,400. ROAS: 23x.

Case Study 4: Charter School

Campaign: Enrollment campaign targeting competitor school open houses and residential neighborhoods. 8-week campaign, $6,500 budget.

Results: 520,000 impressions. 0.28% CTR. 847 website visits. 124 information request form submissions. 38 enrollment applications. 22 new students enrolled. Average per-pupil revenue: $9,200. Total attributed revenue: $202,400. ROAS: 31x.

Case Study 5: Luxury Spa

Campaign: Bridal season campaign targeting bridal boutiques and wedding venues. 4-month campaign, $4,200 budget.

Results: 340,000 impressions. 0.45% CTR. 67 new client bookings. 28 bridal party packages booked. Average bridal package value: $1,850. Average new client lifetime value: $2,400. Total attributed revenue: $119,000. ROAS: 28x.

Case Study 6: Staffing Agency

Campaign: Candidate acquisition targeting manufacturing facilities and competitor staffing offices. 60-day campaign, $7,800 budget.

Results: 680,000 impressions. 0.31% CTR. 312 application submissions. 89 qualified placements. Average placement fee: $3,200. Total attributed revenue: $284,800. ROAS: 36x.

Key Lessons Across All Case Studies

Across these examples, reported outcomes vary with location selection, creative, sales cycle, and measurement approach. Attribution windows should be selected for the sales cycle and documented measurement methodology. Organizations should evaluate results against their own objectives and measurement plan.

About the Author
CS

Chuck Stephens

Director of Client Services, Mediavision2020

Specializes in turning geofencing data into measurable business outcomes.

Chuck Stephens is the Director of Client Services at Mediavision2020, focused on translating geofencing data into measurable business outcomes and long-term client success. Chuck works directly with brands and agencies to develop geofencing strategies that drive foot traffic, increase brand awareness, and deliver transparent, real-time reporting through the ChattaBase dashboard.

Client StrategyFoot Traffic AttributionCampaign ReportingChattaBase
Topics:geofencing ROIgeofencing case studiesgeofencing resultshow to measure geofencing ROIgeofencing advertising ROIgeofencing marketing results

Ready to get started?

See how geofencing can grow your business.

Get a Free Quote